Birmingham Criminal Defense Blog : Birmingham DUI & Criminal Defense Lawyer & Attorney : Eversole Law Firm : Criminal and DUI Defense : Serving Birmingham, Montgomery, Alabama

Due apparently to a lack of information sharing between Alabama and federal law enforcement authorities, hundreds if not thousands of people who are barred by law from buying hand guns, rifles and shotguns may have done so with scarcely a problem. According to a recent news report, Alabama failed to report thousands of individuals who are barred from firearms possession to the federal government. This situation could have allowed persons living in cities such as Montgomery, Tuscaloosa, Decatur and Prattville to buy firearms contrary to that allowed by law.

As a Birmingham criminal defense lawyer, I help many people across Alabama who have been accused of a crime. Not all of these individuals are guilty, and all are considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. This latest news article points up the confusion that is sometimes caused by the lack of communication between state and federal agencies.

According to reports, Federal authorities and gun control advocates believe that literally  thousands of potentially unstable mental patients who have been released from state institutions now have easy access to guns because of Alabama's narrowly defined reporting law.

In one instance, a former West Point graduate who served 18 years in the U.S. Army walked into a local Bass Pro Shop and bought a shotgun, pistol and rifle. Police reports indicate that the instant background check run by store personnel in Spanish Fort failed to flag the customer as a person barred from buying a gun. The reason for this, say law enforcement authorities, is due to the fact that Alabama reports just a small fraction of mental health commitments to a national database.

The 42-year-old military veteran, David Otto Gluth, Jr., was previously treated for post-traumatic stress disorder at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Additionally, a psychiatrist who treated him at the AltaPointe Health System in Mobile, AL, stated that Gluth might also suffer from bipolar disorder with psychotic features and other problems. In 2008, he was reportedly involuntarily committed to Searcy Hospital in Mount Vernon, which made him ineligible under federal law to buy or own a gun.

Police were made aware of the potentially mentally unstable individual after he allegedly got into an argument with another customer in the store, talking about his needing a steady hand to shoot someone. A spokesman for the tore said he was confident that the company followed the law.

According to gun control advocates, if a store employee observes strange and threatening behavior from a customer it is a good indication that the gun should not be sold. This was apparently borne when Fairhope police responded to complaints of an armed man walking around the Rock Creek subdivision. They arrested Gluth and booked him on a disorderly conduct charge.

Gun loophole: Alabama fails to report thousands who are barred from firearms possession, AL.com, January 17, 2010

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As a Birmingham criminal defense attorney, I have seen a wide of criminal indictments for crimes ranging from drug manufacturing and computer fraud to assault and murder. If there is one thing I am certain of, that is every citizen’s right to a fair criminal trail and to be considered innocent until proven guilty.

Just last month, two men from Lauderdale County, AL, were charged with extorting money from individuals in northern Alabama. According to news articles, the two posed on numerous occasions as private investigators using their false personas as a way to get money from their alleged victims.

The two men are reportedly both from Florence, Alabama. According to reports, 44-year-old Mark Douglas Wilson and 47-year-old Gregory Jones Harrison were charged with second-degree extortion by law enforcement authorities -- this is a Class C felony and punishable by up to 10 years in prison following a conviction. The recent arrests came following allegations against the two and a subsequent probe by the Alabama Bureau of Investigation.

Officials at the ABI allege that Harrison and Wilson presented themselves as private investigators working under contract with the ABI to conduct investigations into criminal activities. The two men are accused of attempting to extort large sums of money from the various individuals they had targeted.

According to information provided by the ABI, the suspects apparently explained to the victims that their names were included on a list of persons involved in criminal activity and that they would be arrested in an upcoming roundup by law enforcement. The extortion came in the form of promises to remove those person’s names from the fictitious list in exchange for certain payments.

Investigation into the alleged extortion arrangement commenced after the ABI was contacted by a local businessman who said he had been approached by Harrison and Wilson. The investigation reportedly lasted a little more than one week. Following the arrest the two suspects were placed in the Lauderdale County Detention Center until they were released on bail of $1,000 each.

Two local men charged with extortion, TimesDaily.com, January 23, 2010

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As an Birmingham criminal defense attorney, I have the experience to aggressively defend individuals accused of various crimes ranging from petty theft to grand larceny and domestic violence to murder in the first degree. The innocence of defendants in a criminal trial is assumed until a conviction by a jury of their peers. No matter where you live -- Tuscaloosa, Decatur, Madison, Prattville or anywhere else in Alabama -- a jury may acquit a person arrested for a crime if the evidence gathered by the police is lacking, however in the case of some offenses the facts can be quite damning.

The trial of a man accused of fatally shooting a Huntsville police officer has seen some interesting defense tactics. According to recent news articles, Kenneth Shipp was arrested following the shooting death of Officer Eric Freeman in late 2007. The defendant’s criminal lawyer reminded jurors their job was determine whether or not Freeman's death was a result of Shipp’s intention to kill the officer, or simply a tragic result of the defendant’s reported drunkenness that evening.

According to court reports, Shipp was not only intoxicated that night, but was also under the influence of pharmaceutical drugs, which has apparently been established as fact in the case.

This is a serious situation for the defendant, who faces a capital murder charge for killing a police officer in the line of duty. In fact, the prosecution had at the time for the article stated that it would seek the death penalty if the 55-year-old man is convicted.

Based on reports, the shooting incident occurred on December 14, 2007, following what has been described as a simple investigation of a possible DUI traffic accident at Bailey Cove and Weatherly roads. However, that routine drunk driving traffic stop ended moments later when Shipp allegedly shot Officer Freeman at point-blank range with a small .22-caliber pistol.

Police reports show that Shipp shot Freeman as he and another officer, Kevin Lambert, were escorting Shipp to a patrol car to wait for a DUI investigator. When a third officer arrived, he found Lambert, Shipp and another man, a former police officer, wrestling on the ground and trying to get the gun away from Shipp.

Court records indicate that other officers arriving at the scene hear the defendant yelling that he had a bomb and demanding that they shoot and kill him. Based on news reports, Shipp’s defense team questioned whether the defendant’s behavior was consistent with intoxication. In Alabama intoxication is not a defense in and of itself. But it can sometimes be used as a defense if someone is so intoxicated that they suffer from mania and clearly don't know what they are doing.

Defense focus: Shipp intoxication, AL.com, February 02, 2010

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Alabama’s Supreme Court recently issued a stay of execution for a convicted murderer. According to a news report, the stay was granted at the request of Robert Bryant Melson, who received a death sentence in the robbery-murder of three employees of an East Gadsden Popeye’s Chicken and Biscuit restaurant in 1994. As a Birmingham criminal defense lawyer, I have the experience to represent individuals charged with crimes such as grand larceny, assault and murder or manslaughter.

Being an Alabama criminal attorney, I hold that every person accused of a violent crime or other criminal offense is innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. This is everyone’s constitutional right and I adhere to this important rule of law. According to the news article, the execution was to be held on February 18, but has now been delayed to await the outcome of a case being considered by the United States Supreme Court.

The 38-year-old Melson was originally convicted for the slayings of restaurant employees Nathaniel Baker, 17, Tamika Collins, 18, and Darrell Collier, 23. According to reports, a fourth employee, Bryant Archer, was the only survivor of the shootings when Melson and an accomplice, Cuhuatemoc Hinricy Peraita, robbed the restaurant in April 15 of that year. Based on court records of the incident, Archer was also shot during the robbery but survived the ordeal.

Melson’s stay was granted by the Alabama Supreme Court at Melson's request so that he and his attorney could to hear the outcome of a Florida case that is currently being considered by the U.S. Supreme Court. That case reportedly involves an issue similar to Melson's case, which revolves around whether petitions were filed in a timely manner.

This stay would appear to be Melson’s last chance, since records indicate that he exhausted his final appeal last October when it was denied by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Alabama Supreme Court stays Melson's execution, GadsdenTimes.com, January 27, 2010

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Being charged with the traffic death of another individual in Alabama can be a terribly stressful situation for most anyone. As a criminal defense lawyer who has defended numerous people accused of crimes in Birmingham and other parts of the state, I know that when a traffic fatality results in a murder charge, it tops the list of serious crimes. This is when you need a competent and experienced criminal lawyer to handle your case.

A recent case being brought before a local court has put a Mobile man in the defendant’s chair. According to news articles, Leon Joseph Smith was charged with murder in the drunk driving-related death of a 20-year-old motorcycle rider in 2008. Based on reports, Christopher Willis was killed on September 27, 2008, when his motorcycle slammed into Smith's car, which allegedly turned in front of the motorcycle.

Although police say that Smith was drunk at the time, the man’s defense attorney has pointed out that Willis was speeding at the time of the collision -- his bike was reportedly traveling in excess of 70mph. Police reports indicate that Willis had been dining at a local restaurant earlier in the afternoon and was headed to a friend's home to watch a football game when the crash occurred.

According to police, Smith had a blood-alcohol content (BAC) four times the legal limit in Alabama. Smith, 64, was cited for the crash that instantly killed Willis on Hillcrest Road around 4pm on a Saturday afternoon.

Emergency medical technicians responding to the accident reportedly saw Smith, who refused medical treatment, gargling mouthwash at the scene. The driver declined to take any field sobriety tests, and was subsequently arrested by the police.

News reports show that a later test revealed Smith's blood-alcohol level to be "at least" 0.365 percent.Prosecutors maintain that Smith, being drunk, showed a "reckless indifference for other people on the roadway."Alabama law allows for drivers to be charged with manslaughter or murder if they cause a fatal accident while driving under the influence.

Mobile man faces murder charge for traffic wreck, AL.com, December 08, 2009

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Reading a recent news report, I saw that The Shoals is way overrepresented when it comes to people on death row. Being convicted of murder is about as serious as it gets in the criminal arena, and death row is a place nobody wants to go. As an Alabama criminal defense attorney, I have represented many individuals accused of murder, homicide or manslaughter. Depending on the circumstances, some people in this situation simply do not deserve the death penalty.

At the time of the article, there were 203 inmates on death row in Alabama. Of those, 10 inmates had committed one or more homicides in Colbert, Franklin or Lauderdale counties. Five of those death row inmates from the Shoals and were there since March 2007. Many are waiting for a decision from the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals or Supreme Court.

Although more people have been sentenced to death in Colbert, Franklin and Lauderdale in the past 25 months than were sent to death row in the previous 25 years, local prosecutors are not worried the Shoals is becoming a hotbed for violent homicides.

"We're not any more violent than we have ever been," said Lauderdale County District Attorney Chris Connolly. "Every murder is violent. I just think juries are just fed up with crime and they are willing to recommend the death penalty where they feel it is warranted. There were capital murder cases here in the past where there was a conviction, but the jury recommended life without parole and the judge upheld the recommendation."

In Alabama, life without the possibility of parole and the death penalty are the only sentencing options for capital murder. Jurors recommend a punishment in capital cases, but the judge is not bound to follow the recommendation.

According to Alabama law, any time a homicide is committed for monetary gain; committed during another felony such as robbery; has more than one victim; the victim was a law enforcement officer; or the victim was younger than 14, it meets the criteria for capital murder in Alabama.

However, it does occur occasionally that when a homicide even meets the criteria for capital murder, the victim's family asks prosecutors to not pursue the death penalty. This can happen for a variety of reasons. Sometimes the victim’s family doesn't believe in the death penalty for moral or religious reasons, or they just don't want to have to spend 15 or 20 years or even more going to appeal hearings for the person convicted of killing a loved one.

Alabama death row has strong Shoals presence, TimesDaily.com, September 14, 2009

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

A local mother has been charged with conspiracy to commit murder and solicitation of murder in the shooting of another woman. As an Alabama criminal defense lawyer, my firm has represented clients in situations similar to 42-year-old Yolanda Seay, who was arrested in mid-August at her home in Birmingham. According to news reports, Seay was taken to county jail after a judge set her bond at $120,000. Conspiracy and solicitation are serious charges that require a skilled legal professional well versed in Alabama criminal law and knowledge of the Alabama criminal appeals process.

This woman’s situation is very complicated because Seay has been linked to crimes allegedly committed by other family members over the years. Seay’s sons, Cortez, Martez and Demarius have been charged or convicted at various times with separate slayings and attempted murder. News reports indicate that only recently did police connect Yolanda Seay with some of the crimes committed by her sons.

Investigators reportedly believe that Yolanda Seay played an active role in the planning and solicitation of the shooting of Kandi Hawkins, a witness against two of her sons in separate cases. Hawkins was shot in June and apparently left for dead. She reportedly survived the shooting, however injuries suffered during that incident left her a quadriplegic and she is currently being cared for at an undisclosed location.

Seay’s first-born, 25-year-old Martez, has been charged with capital murder in the May execution-style slaying of Lonnie Vaughn, a Vestavia Hills father of two who was found in northeast Jefferson County, nude and shot multiple times. Hawkins also is charged with capital murder in that case. Martez Seay has also been charged with solicitation for murder and conspiracy to commit murder in the shooting of Hawkins, who reportedly was his girlfriend.

The youngest Seay son, Demarius, is awaiting trial for capital murder in the April 2008 shooting death of a 17-year-old Parker High School student. Demarius is also charged with attempted murder in the shooting of Hawkins.

According to news reports, Yolanda Seay’s middle child, Cortez, pleaded guilty and was sentence to life in prison for the 2004 murder of a 50-year-old man at a drug house. Cortez Seay was convicted of killing the man over a money dispute.

Mom burdened when three sons implicated in Birmingham murders is now charged too, AL.com, August 17, 2009

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

A Mobile, Alabama, man was recently charged with murder following a fatal pickup truck crash in Grand Bay, AL, that killed two passengers, as well as seriously injuring the driver and a third passenger. The wreck occurred in the early evening of May 29 when a truck driven by 29-year-old Carl Miller left Ramsey Road and hit a tree at a high rate of speed, killing his two cousins, Billy J. Miller, 17, and Joseph Miller, 20.

According to reports, the Mobile County District Attorney's office alleges that Miller was under the influence of alcohol and marijuana at the time of the accident. The police investigation revealed that the truck was traveling between 90-100 mph prior to going off the road and hitting the tree. Authorities also said that none of the truck’s occupants was wearing a seatbelt.

This is a tragedy of the first order. Three of the people, the two victims and the driver, were relatives, and that family has suffered a terrible loss. Obviously, the driver exhibited poor judgment, but to charge him with two counts of murder is an added blow to the families and relatives of these men. In addition, Miller was charged with leaving the scene of an automobile injury accident.

As a Birmingham criminal and DUI defense lawyer, I have represented clients in this type of situation before. There is no doubt that the allegations pose a huge challenge to this man’s defense, but that is why criminal attorneys like myself have devoted entire careers to helping those individuals accused of a crime, even when the odds appear stacked against them.

For Mr. Miller, police say he was drunk and maybe under the influence of marijuana. Add to that the allegation that he left the scene of the accident and it would seem that he is guilty. But there could be plausible reasons for his leaving. Of course, guilt is one possibility, but maybe he left because he wanted to get help for himself and the other men -- he and the other survivor of the crash both had serious injuries. Frankly, we won’t know the details until his trial.

Mobile Man Charged With Murder In Deadly Wreck, WKRG.com, June 1, 2009

Murder charges filed against driver in double fatality, AL.com, May 31, 2009
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link