Alabama DUI Law Changes

The Alabama Criminal Appeals Court changed Alabama DUI law today and shortened sentences for those with multiple Alabama DUI convictions.  In the past, any four Alabama DUI convictions resulted in a felony.  Now, in order to constitute a felony, the four Alabama DUI convictions must be within a five year period.  Thus, if you have three DUI convictions within a five year period, but then receive a fourth Alabama DUI conviction in six years, that DUI conviction is not a felony.  In the past, that fourth DUI conviction, regardless of how many years have passed, would have resulted in a felony DUI conviction.   

Alabama Woman On Horseback Charged With A DUI

An Alabama women was charged with a DUI for, "riding under the influence."  This story is a couple months old, but helps make my point.  The crazy, "MADD" mothers against drunk driving have caused Alabama to go insane.  Alabama code 32-5A-191 specifically requires that in order to be guilty of driving under the influence, you must be driving or under the physical control, "of a motor vehicle."  Does anyone think this horse has wheels or an engine? How in the world can the language of the Alabama Statute be interpreted any other way than to require some kind of motorized vehicle?  According to Websters, the definition of motor vehicle is as follows:

 motor vehicle
Function: noun
: an automotive vehicle not operated on rails; especially : one with rubber tires for use on highways

This is just another crazy example of police powers run amok and MADD mothers running our legislature and courts.  I guess the horse had rubber horseshoes.  What's next, no bull-riding while intoxicated?  What fun would that be. 

DUI Celebrities - Jeremy Stevens Found Guilty of DUI

Jeremy Stevens, the Tampa Bay Buccaneer's tight-end, was found guilty of DUI today.  The officer that testified against Stevens, said "he smelled of alcohol, had bloodshot eyes and slurred speech."  I find this interesting because this seems to be the standard refrain from police officers in DUI cases.  It's like they are issued manuals pieced together from old DUI case law.  Those three descriptions are testified to with such repetition, you would think everyone who ever drove a car after drinking, must poor kegs of beer over their heads, smoke a pound of hash, and get so stumbling drunk they talk like Otis from the Andy Griffith show.  

What is so shocking about this kind of testimony is its subjectivity.  Lets say the cop had a bad day, or you just pissed him off because you didn't kiss his bloody bum.  It becomes really easy for him to say, "You smell like alcohol, step out of the car."  It is also really easy to make up on the stand when pressured by defense counsel.  I know most cops would not do these things. But in my experience, I have seen it occur to often to believe it doesn't happen with some regularity.