Field Sobriety Tests Are Inaccurate!

Field sobriety tests are very inaccurate.  The tests are completely subjective and should not be used as proof of guilt in any court proceeding.  Has anyone ever passed a field sobriety test in Alabama?  I doubt it.  If the cop wants to arrest you, you can bet the night in jail that your performance on a field sobriety test will make little difference.  Apparently, cops are like superman, they have laser vision.  They are able to discern an inch difference in the placement of your feet on a dark highway with little to no light,  and are able to stand on one foot while counting for 30 seconds at a time, without ever moving a muscle or slightly adjusting their leg.  I don't know about you, but standing on one foot for thirty seconds is hard to do at all, sober or not.  Don't believe me, try it.  Make sure your foot does not touch your leg or almost touch the ground, and make sure you don't sway too much while doing so either.  I have heard all these grounds used as a cops reasoning to arrest someone for DUI.  As I have said on this blog several times, do not take a field sobriety test. 

Alabama DUI - You Have Ten Days to.....

Have you been charged with a DUI in Alabama?  If so, you have only 10 days to request an administrative hearing or your license will be suspended.  You should receive notice of this fact from the arresting officer.  If you lose your license, your only option is to appeal the decision to the Circuit Court within 30 days. 

The license loss is distinct from any criminal penalties. This means that you can lose your license while being found "guilty," or "not guilty," in an Alabama DUI trial.  Makes you wonder what happened to the concept, "innocent until proven guilty."  In this case, it's not even, "guilty until proven innocent."  It's simply, "guilty."  Now some will argue that balancing this equation is the administrative hearing.  But does the administrative hearing really provide the same kind of safe guards that are enshrined into our Constitution and afforded those accused of crimes?  Furthermore, even if you somehow believe that taking someone's license for a crime he has not been proven to commit is fair, I would then scream Double Jeopardy.  It is supposedly illegal to charge someone with the same crime twice, no matter how you look at it, and no matter how it may have been interpreted, the prohibition against Doubly Jeopardy is not esoteric.  It's plain meaning will suffice. 

Sorry for the digressive rant.  Back to my original subject.  The 10 day rule applies to you if you meet any of the following conditions:

  • BAC over .08 while driving or under control of a vehicle
  • BAC at or above .02 and you are below the age of 21
  • BAC over .04 at time of arrest for Commercial Drivers
  • You refused to take breath test

If you do not request an administrative hearing within ten days of arrest you will lose your license. You could lose your license in this manner anywhere from 90 days to several years.  Factors to be considered in determining how long you could lose your license include:

  1. Driving Category
  2. Age
  3. Driving Record

Moral of the story, hire an Alabama DUI & Criminal Defense attorney that focuses his practice on defending those accused of a DUI.  I spend hundreds of hours perfecting the defense of those accused of DUI.  I have read all relevant publications, including hundreds of DUI and Criminal Defense Blogs from all over the country.  I also regularly attend legal education seminars devoted to DUI defense. Not to mention , I obsessively update this blog to make it the best source of information available to those accused on a DUI in Alabama.  Combined I spend around 25-30 hours a week studying Alabama DUI & Criminal Defense Law.  The law is way too complicated these days for an attorney to be a jack-of-all-trades.  When your reputation, money, job, or freedom is on the line, you need an attorney that makes Alabama DUI & Criminal Defense his priority.  Riddle me this:  Did you get your plumbing fixed by the electrician?

 

DUI Breathalyzer -- WARNING: DO NOT TAKE!

Ha Ha Ha!  Fellow blogger, and the "Go to guy for DUI"(in California that is),  Hunter Biederman nails Judge Smails...umm...I mean William Kortemier for refusing to take a breath test.  See Hunter expose the fat cats for what they are.  Biederman illuminates the hypocrisy many in power dish out on a daily basis.  Now I am a big believer of the idea that you are not guilty, and innocent until proven guilty, in court, by a jury of your peers, and beyond a reasonable doubt.  However, I bet he is a kind of guy who deals harshly with alcohol offenders, and who will take advantage of every legal trick in the book to get out of his DUI, then look down his nose at us mere mortals.  The moral of this story ladies and gents, please, for the love of God, Allah, Buddha, Vishnu, Zeus, or Odin, DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE(UNLESS YOU HAVE NEVER HAD A SIP OF ALCOHOL IN YOUR ENTIRE LIFE-(AND YOU STILL PROBABLY SHOULDN'T) take a breath test, by the road or at the police station;  or take a field sobriety test(AT LEAST WITHOUT YOUR ATTORNEY PRESENT-AND YOU STILL PROBABLY SHOULDN'T)!

Be like the fat cats. They have the inside knowledge and power. They don't take DUI field sobriety tests. They don't take DUI breath tests. The reason the fat cats don't take DUI field sobriety tests or DUI breathalyzers is simple. They know it is much more difficult to prove driving under the influence of alcohol when you don't have physical evidence.  When you take a breath test or field sobriety test, you are literally just handing over evidence to help convict yourself.  You might as well drive your car through the police station window, while puking, with bottles of Jack Daniels rolling across the dash, stumble up to the first police officer you see, and slurringly say, "I'll have a double my good man."