Birmingham Criminal Defense Blog : Birmingham DUI & Criminal Defense Lawyer & Attorney : Eversole Law Firm : Criminal and DUI Defense : Serving Birmingham, Montgomery, Alabama

Due apparently to a lack of information sharing between Alabama and federal law enforcement authorities, hundreds if not thousands of people who are barred by law from buying hand guns, rifles and shotguns may have done so with scarcely a problem. According to a recent news report, Alabama failed to report thousands of individuals who are barred from firearms possession to the federal government. This situation could have allowed persons living in cities such as Montgomery, Tuscaloosa, Decatur and Prattville to buy firearms contrary to that allowed by law.

As a Birmingham criminal defense lawyer, I help many people across Alabama who have been accused of a crime. Not all of these individuals are guilty, and all are considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. This latest news article points up the confusion that is sometimes caused by the lack of communication between state and federal agencies.

According to reports, Federal authorities and gun control advocates believe that literally  thousands of potentially unstable mental patients who have been released from state institutions now have easy access to guns because of Alabama's narrowly defined reporting law.

In one instance, a former West Point graduate who served 18 years in the U.S. Army walked into a local Bass Pro Shop and bought a shotgun, pistol and rifle. Police reports indicate that the instant background check run by store personnel in Spanish Fort failed to flag the customer as a person barred from buying a gun. The reason for this, say law enforcement authorities, is due to the fact that Alabama reports just a small fraction of mental health commitments to a national database.

The 42-year-old military veteran, David Otto Gluth, Jr., was previously treated for post-traumatic stress disorder at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Additionally, a psychiatrist who treated him at the AltaPointe Health System in Mobile, AL, stated that Gluth might also suffer from bipolar disorder with psychotic features and other problems. In 2008, he was reportedly involuntarily committed to Searcy Hospital in Mount Vernon, which made him ineligible under federal law to buy or own a gun.

Police were made aware of the potentially mentally unstable individual after he allegedly got into an argument with another customer in the store, talking about his needing a steady hand to shoot someone. A spokesman for the tore said he was confident that the company followed the law.

According to gun control advocates, if a store employee observes strange and threatening behavior from a customer it is a good indication that the gun should not be sold. This was apparently borne when Fairhope police responded to complaints of an armed man walking around the Rock Creek subdivision. They arrested Gluth and booked him on a disorderly conduct charge.

Gun loophole: Alabama fails to report thousands who are barred from firearms possession, AL.com, January 17, 2010

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As a Birmingham criminal defense attorney, I have seen a wide of criminal indictments for crimes ranging from drug manufacturing and computer fraud to assault and murder. If there is one thing I am certain of, that is every citizen’s right to a fair criminal trail and to be considered innocent until proven guilty.

Just last month, two men from Lauderdale County, AL, were charged with extorting money from individuals in northern Alabama. According to news articles, the two posed on numerous occasions as private investigators using their false personas as a way to get money from their alleged victims.

The two men are reportedly both from Florence, Alabama. According to reports, 44-year-old Mark Douglas Wilson and 47-year-old Gregory Jones Harrison were charged with second-degree extortion by law enforcement authorities -- this is a Class C felony and punishable by up to 10 years in prison following a conviction. The recent arrests came following allegations against the two and a subsequent probe by the Alabama Bureau of Investigation.

Officials at the ABI allege that Harrison and Wilson presented themselves as private investigators working under contract with the ABI to conduct investigations into criminal activities. The two men are accused of attempting to extort large sums of money from the various individuals they had targeted.

According to information provided by the ABI, the suspects apparently explained to the victims that their names were included on a list of persons involved in criminal activity and that they would be arrested in an upcoming roundup by law enforcement. The extortion came in the form of promises to remove those person’s names from the fictitious list in exchange for certain payments.

Investigation into the alleged extortion arrangement commenced after the ABI was contacted by a local businessman who said he had been approached by Harrison and Wilson. The investigation reportedly lasted a little more than one week. Following the arrest the two suspects were placed in the Lauderdale County Detention Center until they were released on bail of $1,000 each.

Two local men charged with extortion, TimesDaily.com, January 23, 2010

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As an Birmingham criminal defense attorney, I have the experience to aggressively defend individuals accused of various crimes ranging from petty theft to grand larceny and domestic violence to murder in the first degree. The innocence of defendants in a criminal trial is assumed until a conviction by a jury of their peers. No matter where you live -- Tuscaloosa, Decatur, Madison, Prattville or anywhere else in Alabama -- a jury may acquit a person arrested for a crime if the evidence gathered by the police is lacking, however in the case of some offenses the facts can be quite damning.

The trial of a man accused of fatally shooting a Huntsville police officer has seen some interesting defense tactics. According to recent news articles, Kenneth Shipp was arrested following the shooting death of Officer Eric Freeman in late 2007. The defendant’s criminal lawyer reminded jurors their job was determine whether or not Freeman's death was a result of Shipp’s intention to kill the officer, or simply a tragic result of the defendant’s reported drunkenness that evening.

According to court reports, Shipp was not only intoxicated that night, but was also under the influence of pharmaceutical drugs, which has apparently been established as fact in the case.

This is a serious situation for the defendant, who faces a capital murder charge for killing a police officer in the line of duty. In fact, the prosecution had at the time for the article stated that it would seek the death penalty if the 55-year-old man is convicted.

Based on reports, the shooting incident occurred on December 14, 2007, following what has been described as a simple investigation of a possible DUI traffic accident at Bailey Cove and Weatherly roads. However, that routine drunk driving traffic stop ended moments later when Shipp allegedly shot Officer Freeman at point-blank range with a small .22-caliber pistol.

Police reports show that Shipp shot Freeman as he and another officer, Kevin Lambert, were escorting Shipp to a patrol car to wait for a DUI investigator. When a third officer arrived, he found Lambert, Shipp and another man, a former police officer, wrestling on the ground and trying to get the gun away from Shipp.

Court records indicate that other officers arriving at the scene hear the defendant yelling that he had a bomb and demanding that they shoot and kill him. Based on news reports, Shipp’s defense team questioned whether the defendant’s behavior was consistent with intoxication. In Alabama intoxication is not a defense in and of itself. But it can sometimes be used as a defense if someone is so intoxicated that they suffer from mania and clearly don't know what they are doing.

Defense focus: Shipp intoxication, AL.com, February 02, 2010

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Alabama’s Supreme Court recently issued a stay of execution for a convicted murderer. According to a news report, the stay was granted at the request of Robert Bryant Melson, who received a death sentence in the robbery-murder of three employees of an East Gadsden Popeye’s Chicken and Biscuit restaurant in 1994. As a Birmingham criminal defense lawyer, I have the experience to represent individuals charged with crimes such as grand larceny, assault and murder or manslaughter.

Being an Alabama criminal attorney, I hold that every person accused of a violent crime or other criminal offense is innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. This is everyone’s constitutional right and I adhere to this important rule of law. According to the news article, the execution was to be held on February 18, but has now been delayed to await the outcome of a case being considered by the United States Supreme Court.

The 38-year-old Melson was originally convicted for the slayings of restaurant employees Nathaniel Baker, 17, Tamika Collins, 18, and Darrell Collier, 23. According to reports, a fourth employee, Bryant Archer, was the only survivor of the shootings when Melson and an accomplice, Cuhuatemoc Hinricy Peraita, robbed the restaurant in April 15 of that year. Based on court records of the incident, Archer was also shot during the robbery but survived the ordeal.

Melson’s stay was granted by the Alabama Supreme Court at Melson's request so that he and his attorney could to hear the outcome of a Florida case that is currently being considered by the U.S. Supreme Court. That case reportedly involves an issue similar to Melson's case, which revolves around whether petitions were filed in a timely manner.

This stay would appear to be Melson’s last chance, since records indicate that he exhausted his final appeal last October when it was denied by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Alabama Supreme Court stays Melson's execution, GadsdenTimes.com, January 27, 2010

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Reading a recent news report, I saw that The Shoals is way overrepresented when it comes to people on death row. Being convicted of murder is about as serious as it gets in the criminal arena, and death row is a place nobody wants to go. As an Alabama criminal defense attorney, I have represented many individuals accused of murder, homicide or manslaughter. Depending on the circumstances, some people in this situation simply do not deserve the death penalty.

At the time of the article, there were 203 inmates on death row in Alabama. Of those, 10 inmates had committed one or more homicides in Colbert, Franklin or Lauderdale counties. Five of those death row inmates from the Shoals and were there since March 2007. Many are waiting for a decision from the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals or Supreme Court.

Although more people have been sentenced to death in Colbert, Franklin and Lauderdale in the past 25 months than were sent to death row in the previous 25 years, local prosecutors are not worried the Shoals is becoming a hotbed for violent homicides.

"We're not any more violent than we have ever been," said Lauderdale County District Attorney Chris Connolly. "Every murder is violent. I just think juries are just fed up with crime and they are willing to recommend the death penalty where they feel it is warranted. There were capital murder cases here in the past where there was a conviction, but the jury recommended life without parole and the judge upheld the recommendation."

In Alabama, life without the possibility of parole and the death penalty are the only sentencing options for capital murder. Jurors recommend a punishment in capital cases, but the judge is not bound to follow the recommendation.

According to Alabama law, any time a homicide is committed for monetary gain; committed during another felony such as robbery; has more than one victim; the victim was a law enforcement officer; or the victim was younger than 14, it meets the criteria for capital murder in Alabama.

However, it does occur occasionally that when a homicide even meets the criteria for capital murder, the victim's family asks prosecutors to not pursue the death penalty. This can happen for a variety of reasons. Sometimes the victim’s family doesn't believe in the death penalty for moral or religious reasons, or they just don't want to have to spend 15 or 20 years or even more going to appeal hearings for the person convicted of killing a loved one.

Alabama death row has strong Shoals presence, TimesDaily.com, September 14, 2009

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As a Birmingham, Alabama DUI and Criminal Defense lawyer and attorney, I strongly condemn the death penalty.   Alabama is set to execute Thomas Arthur on September 26, 2007.  Although the death penalty is horrific and should not be endorsed by an advanced intellectual society, it is worse in the backward state of Alabama.  Mr. Arthur contends he is innocent and Governor Riley refuses to allow DNA testing that could exonerate Mr. Arthur.  According to the Innocence Project, fifteen death row inmates have been exonerated nationwide by DNA testing thus far, some just days before they were scheduled to be executed.  As the Innocence Project points out , if any of these men were on death row in Alabama, they would be dead by now.  If a state is going to continue the barbaric act of execution, it is unconscionable that with today's technology, every person scheduled to die does not receive DNA testing.  Shouldn't the state at least make sure, by every possible means, the people they execute are actually guilty?  Or does Governor Riley and the state of Alabama really care who we execute, as long as someone pays for the act they are alleged to have committed, and come election time, the politicians can act like they are tough against crime. 

Forty-two states now allow for post-conviction DNA testing.  As always, Alabama is one of the last holdouts to a bygone era.  There are a lot of great things about this state, it is my home, I love it, and its people dearly.  However, when it comes to the death penalty in general and DNA testing specifically, I think everyone should ask a simple question: "What would Jesus do?'

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link