Criminal Law News: O.J. Simpson Gets Bail

In recent criminal law news, O.J. Simpson did not enter a plea today.  His bail was set at $125,000 for an armed robbery at a Las Vegas casino.  O.J. was asked if he understood the charges against him and he is expected to be released soon.  O.J. is facing life in prison and is charged with ten felony counts:

  • Two counts of first degree kidnapping
  • Two counts of robbery with a deadly weapon
  • Burglary while in possession of a firearm
  • Coercion while in possession of a deadly weapon
  • Two counts of assault with a deadly weapon
  • Conspiracy to commit kidnapping
  • Conspiracy to commit robbery

 

Prosecutors File Charges Against O.J. Simpson

Prosecutors filed formal charges against O.J. Simpson today.  O.J. faces ten felony charges including kidnapping and armed robbery.  The juice faces life imprisonment if convicted in the robbery.  He is accused of trying to steal sports memorabilia at the Palace Station casino.  O.J. is going to need a really, really good criminal defense attorney at this point.  His alleged cohorts are already coping pleas and ratting to save their own skin.  It is a shame that when a celebrity criminal defendant is involved, the district attorney is more concerned about nabbing the "big fish," and getting into the papers than justice.  This is the same scenario we saw with the Michael Vick escapade.  The other participants, who may have actually been more heavily involved in the crime, get a light sentence in exchange for testifying against the celebrity.  And how reliable is this testimony anyway? These are confessed criminals who are now trying to save their own skin, wouldn't they say or do anything to get off easier?  I certainly think so.  I think it is an injustice that this kind of accomplice testimony is allowed in court proceedings.  This type of testimony has to be more unreliable than say, hearsay for example.  Also, as an aside, how can a self-respecting criminal defense attorney represent a rat?