Birmingham Criminal Defense Blog : Birmingham DUI & Criminal Defense Lawyer & Attorney : Eversole Law Firm : Criminal and DUI Defense : Serving Birmingham, Montgomery, Alabama

The United States Supreme Court recently decided that the well-known Miranda right pertaining to “remaining silent” has an expiration date. This could have wide-ranging effects on individuals arrested for crimes in cities like Montgomery, Mobile, Huntsville and other smaller towns around Alabama. As a Birmingham criminal attorney, my first concern is to provide an aggressive defense to my clients.

With this latest Supreme Court ruling, a suspect in a criminal case could theoretically be questioned two weeks following his initial Miranda reading and actually not have the protection normally expected of that law. In fact, the Supreme Court has said that a suspect who invokes his "right to remain silent" under Miranda can be questioned again after 14 days if he agrees to talk to law enforcement authorities of his own free will, he could unintentionally incriminate himself, allowing prosecutors to essentially use those more recent statements against him in a court of law.

According to reports, the 9-to-0 Supreme Court decision over a child abuse case essentially overturned a nearly 30-year-old rule that has barred the police from questioning a suspect once he had asked to remain silent and to speak with a lawyer.

The "Edwards rule" as it is also known was initially created in 1981 to prevent investigators from harassing suspects who are held in jail following their invocation of their Miranda rights. Prior to the inclusion of this rule, it was not uncommon for police to awaken a suspect in the middle of the night and ask him again to waive his rights and to admit to a crime.

More recently, this rule has been understood to preclude the police from re-questioning a freed suspect, even for other crimes in other places. As part of their ruling, Supreme Court justices stated that although the rule made sense for suspects who were held in jail, it did not make sense for suspects who had gone free.

"In a country that harbors a large number of repeat offenders, the consequence [of this no-further-questioning rule] is disastrous," Justice Antonin Scalia said, adding, “If there has been a "break in custody" and the suspect has gone free, the police should be allowed to speak with him after some period of time.

According to court records, the Court settled on 14 days because it "provides plenty of time for the suspect to get reacclimated to his normal life [and] to consult with friends and counsel."

As a result of this ruling, the high court overturned a lower court decision, essentially saying that the incriminating statements made by the defendant in the child abuse case -- weeks after the original Miranda reading -- could be used to convict him. It’s important to note that while all nine justices agreed on the outcome, two did not agree with the 14-day rule -- Justice John Paul Stevens said that time period was too short, and Justice Clarence Thomas said it was too long.

Supreme Court puts expiration date on 'right to remain silent', LATimes.com, February 25, 2010

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Times are tough and it's not surprising that some people are resorting to pretty crimes to make ends meet. As an Alabama criminal defense attorney, I have the skills to represent individuals caught in the legal system as a result of alleged illegal activities. Whether you live in Montgomery, Tuscaloosa, Decatur, Gadsden, or Opelika, local law enforcement has little tolerance for crimes of all types.

From speeding tickets and minor vandalism to sex crimes and felonious assault, courts from Huntsville to Mobile are seeing more and more criminal cases. The number of persons going before criminal court judges will likely increase in the future thanks to new legislation being pushed by local politicians.

According to reports, Alabama officials are looking to increase the penalties for gang-related crimes, such as graffiti painting. Although not as serious as other crimes, such as grand larceny, child pornography and criminal sexual behavior, graffiti painting has become a highly visible act that authorities apparently want to wipe out.

Reportedly, local legislators are working on a bill that will provide specific penalties for gang-related activities, including harsher punishment for so-called vandals who paint graffiti.

At the time of the news article, Alabama Senator Roger Bedford of Russellville and Representative Johnny Mack Morrow of Red Bay, were poised to introduce the Alabama Streetgang Act, brought about due to the frequent instances of graffiti painting in Russellville, AL.

Alabama does not have specific penalties related to gang activity. The proposed law would deem it a criminal offense to participate in an organized group of criminals or assist such groups. The law is supposed to boost the punishment for graffiti, which gangs reportedly use to mark their territory, according to law enforcement agencies.

Over the last several months, groups identified as the "South Side 13," "Latin Kings," "18th Street" and "13th Street" have spray-painted various structures around the city, including sports parks, business establishments and billboards.

In one instance, police arrested four juveniles found coming out of an alley on Washington Street near a graffiti painted hardware store. According to Russellville police, the four were carrying bags containing spray-paint cans and also had paint on their hands and clothing.

Although the four youths allegedly admitted having painted graffiti on the local business, news reports indicate that police officials remain frustration that current laws would not allow them to made examples out of those four kids.

Based on news articles, the proposed law would recognize four new punishable offenses:

1) Graffiti damage of more than $2,500 would be a Class B felony
2) Graffiti damage between $500 and $2,500 would be a Class C felony
3) Graffiti damage less than $500 would be a misdemeanor
4) Possession and distribution of graffiti tools would be a Class A misdemeanor

Officials want stiffer graffiti punishment, TimesDaily.com, January 23, 2010

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As a Birmingham criminal defense lawyer, I know that a percentage of people arrested for various non-violent crimes were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. In the eyes of law enforcement, however, there is no justification for breaking any Alabama law. But as a defense lawyer for individuals who have been accused of crimes, I know that a person’s motivations and actions can often fall into a gray area. This is why we have trials that allow defendants a chance to explain themselves.

Regardless of where you live or work -- Montgomery, Tuscaloosa, Auburn or Prichard, or anywhere across the state for that matter -- illegal gambling can and does lure many otherwise law abiding folks, which then makes a possible arrest and conviction something that can adversely impact a person’s life. Not long ago, Alabama’s Department of Public Safety (DPS) announced a number of raids on and continuing investigations of gambling dens in Macon and Houston counties.

According to reports, DPS and the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board took part in law enforcement operations at VictoryLand and Country Crossing, and has ongoing operations in these areas.

Part of the Governor's Task Force on Illegal Gambling, DPS officials say that the conducting of these raids on other law enforcement operations are usually held without notice, which is standard protocol. Usually police and other agencies will perform early-morning raids of suspected illicit gambling locations, catching the operators and their clients in the act.

The element of surprise is particularly important, according to police, because any evidence found as a result can contribute to the prosecution of other more serious crimes, such as theft, fraud, financial and tax crimes, not to mention public corruption.

Editorial: Ala. Dept of Public Safety & Gaming Raids, WSFA.com, February 02, 2010

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Across the state of Alabama, in towns and cities like Hoover, Phenix City, Huntsville and Dothan, individuals are arrested daily for crimes such as assault, theft, drug possession and criminal sexual behavior. As a Birmingham criminal defense lawyer, I understand the circumstances that can get a person caught up in the legal system. State and federal crimes can result in criminal convictions and lengthy jail and prison sentences.

It happens all of the time in this state and the appeals process can be critical in avoiding a life-altering conviction. Recently, the Alabama Supreme Court refused a final appeal by a DeKalb County man who was arrested for producing pornographic videos of juveniles at a business he once owned. He was convicted in 1990 and sentenced to four consecutive life terms.

According to news reports, 66-year-old David Lawrence Poole, who is currently serving his sentence at the Limestone Correctional Facility, had his final appeal denied without comment by this state’s highest court.

Based on new articles, the former owner of the Rainsville skating rink was arrested in 1989 at his DeKalb County home following complaints of a hidden camera located in a heating duct grille in the rink’s bathroom. A police investigation not only uncovered the video equipment, but by tracing the coaxial cable running from the camera to the suspect’s trailer parked next to the facility, law enforcement officials also found a cache of pornographic tapes.

Prior to this latest and apparently final attempt to appeal a guilty verdict, Poole had gone before the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals last October. The result of that last appeal was a rejection by the court to hear Poole's case.

Eight years ago, Poole petitioned the Court of Criminal Appeals claiming that he was prosecuted in violation of search warrant laws and that the indictment was flawed. The original charges included four counts of producing obscene matter depicting persons under 17 years of age involved in obscene acts. According to reports, Poole later pleaded guilty to a fifth count.

Poole was arrested after a video camera was found behind a vent grille in the ceiling of the men's room at the skating rink he operated in 1989. A coaxial cable ran from the camera to Poole's trailer next to the rink.

Producer of porn tapes loses final state appeal, AL.com, January 15, 2010

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The poor economy apparently hasn't increased the nation's crime rate, but Alabama's continues to rise. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), crime nationwide dropped last year, but not in Northern Alabama. Here in Birmingham, where I maintain my criminal defense practice, I find that a percentage of individuals accused of property and theft crimes do so because of money problems; some are falsely accused.Crime in Montgomery, Tuscaloosa, Mobile and elsewhere seems to have gotten worse. Burglary and motor vehicle thefts are property crimes.

A recent news article reported that law enforcement officials were not surprised about the latest statistics from the FBI. However, police aren’t particularly happy hearing that property crime in Northwest Alabama increased in 2008. Statistics from the Alabama Criminal Justice Information Center's 2008 Crime in Alabama report indicate there were 181,434 property crimes in 2008, compared to 174,802 in 2007 and 164,810 in 2006.

By contrast, the FBI’s report shows that nationwide there were 9.7 million property crimes reported in 2008, about 0.8 percent lower than the 9.8 million reported in 2007.

Tuscumbia Police Chief Tony Logan said the economy has always dictated crime. "With unemployment the highest it's been in years, there are people who are stealing," Logan said. "And with an increasing drug problem and methamphetamine problem, there is more stealing to support that habit; we've all seen an increase in that."

Tuscumbia was the only city Northern Alabama’s five largest cities to see a decline in thefts. There were 161 thefts reported in 2008, compared to 191 in 2007. But Logan said he's worried that the impact of high unemployment will play a bigger role in thefts and burglaries in 2009 than in 2008.

With poor economy, law enforcement officials aren’t surprised, TimesDaily.con, September 27, 2009

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

A Chickasaw, AL, woman was expected to plead guilty to child porn charges after she allegedly drugged two youngsters prior to a sexual encounter with an adult male. As a Birmingham criminal defense lawyer, I know the value of having a qualified legal professional by your side in serious criminal cases like this one. In this particular instance, the defendant reportedly has a history of mental illness, which may be a mitigating factor during sentencing.

According to news reports, 30-year-old Melissa B. Gray was charged by local authorities with drugging two children for sex and was, at the time of the report, expected to make a blind plea to a child porn charge in a Mobile, Alabama, court.

The Chickasaw resident supposedly drugged the two minor as a prelude to a planned sexual encounter with a man she met online. Her possible guilty plea to charges of child pornography was based on documents filed in court by her attorney at the time of the news article.

According to an affidavit filed earlier this year by the Alabama Bureau of Investigation, Jonathan Daniel Bervig from Milton, FL, met Gray over the Internet and began swapping child pornography with her. The affidavit claims that Bervig told investigators in January that he arranged to drive to Gray's house to have sex with a young relative of hers and another child, both of whom would be drugged so as not to resist. However, Bervig said that when he arrived the children were still awake and alert so he left.

According to reports, an undercover investigator, who posed as Bervig, later sent instant messages to Gray, who tried again to set up a sexual liaison. Law enforcement officers went to Gray's home on January 6 and found a prescription for Percocet, a painkiller that can cause drowsiness and confusion. At that time, officers tried unsuccessfully to awaken a seven-year-old boy at the home before taking him to a hospital.

Local police and other law enforcement officials found a computer at Grey’s home with dozens of images of child pornography, as well as incest stories involving young boys, according to investigators.

At the time of the news article, Gray was expected to enter a "blind plea" to possession and distribution of child pornography charges, meaning that she would get no promise of a lenient sentencing recommendation from federal prosecutors in Mobile. The defendant, a former schoolteacher, faces a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in prison. According to reports, the worst-case scenario for her would be just over 12 years, based on advisory sentencing guidelines. U.S. District Judge Kristi DuBose was slated to make the final decision.

Drugging children for sex suspect to make blind plea to child porn charge, AL.com, September 17, 2009

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

A Robertsdale, AL, man has been sentenced to 16 years in prison for trying to have sex with a 14-year-old boy across state lines. According to news reports, David Allen Girard, was arrested and charged with for using a computer facility to lure a minor child to engage in sexual activity. Police said that the man had a previous conviction in Alabama for the possession of child pornography and is a registered sex offender in this state.

Authorities had alleged that the 53-year-old Alabama man chatted with the victim on a web site called “gay.com” in what appears to have been a sting operation to catch sexual predators. As a Birmingham criminal defense lawyer, I have the ability to represent individuals charged with criminal sexual behavior such as this man was.

According to reports, the defendant had apparently arranged to meet the youngster in Pensacola, FL, for the purpose of having sexual relations with him. Driving from his residence in Alabama to Florida, Girard found that the “14-year-old-boy” was actually a fictitious person created by a group of local law enforcement officers working in an undercover Internet sting operation.

Following the out-of-state arrest, the man was taken into custody. Police reportedly found on his person condoms and personal lubrication. A U.S. district judge sentenced Girard to 195 months in federal prison to be followed by a life time term of supervised release.

For anyone who thinks that sex crimes are not serious offenses, this story shows that the penalties can be harsh and remain with a person for their entire life. Because of this, it is always wise to seek the services of a qualified criminal defense attorney who has experience defending individuals accused of criminal sexual behavior.

Alabama man sentenced for trying to have sex with a minor, SRPressGazette.com, October 13, 2009

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

White collar crime in Alabama can range from petty theft to embezzlement to Internet fraud. Hard economic times can cause people to attempt crimes like these, or they can become embroiled in a difficult situation with seemingly no way out. As a Birmingham criminal defense lawyer, I know that many people accused of a particular crime feel they are not guilty. I also know that some people who may have committed a criminal act did so under heavy emotional or financial pressure.

While what happened may seem clear cut, there are usually extenuating circumstances that as defense attorneys we must explain to a jury so they can make an informed decision on the guilt or innocence of a defendant. A recent news article pointed out one kind of crime that may be more common than people imagine. A former SouthBank employee has reportedly been indicted for allegedly stealing more than a half-million dollars from that financial institution.

The defendant, a 48-year-old Huntsville woman, was recently indicted on charges she stole more than $500,000 over a five-year period while she was employed by SouthBank. Keleste Sherrill is a former assistant manager at the bank's Jefferson Street branch. She was charged with bank fraud after having allegedly stolen money from the bank's vault and ATM machines between January 2004 and August 2009. Bank management estimates the total amount at $533,000.

According to reports, SouthBank President Art Freeman said bank officials discovered an irregularity on a Friday afternoon last August. After completing an internal investigation the following Monday, bank officials confronted Sherrill as she arrived at work and described what they had found. Freeman said the woman was cooperative.

The Huntsville prosecutor’s office alleges that Sherrill used ATM ledgers and avoided bank cameras as a part of the scheme, according to the indictment. This initial indictment is just the first phase in the process of criminal prosecution. If convicted, the woman could be looking at up to 30 years in prison and may even have to pay $1 million in fines.

Former SouthBank employee indicted in $500K Huntsville bank theft, AL.com, September 30, 2009
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

It’s a shame when a representative of the court is charged with a crime. Of course, any person accused of a criminal act, such as child pornography or criminal sexual behavior, is always considered innocent until proven guilty. However, to have the charges brought forth in the first place can truly be an embarrassment to the individual and their profession. As a Birmingham criminal defense lawyer, I can empathize with this defendant and only hope that justice will be served quickly and with an even hand.

According to news reports, a Dothan attorney is facing multiple child pornography charges. His legal representative had recently asked the court for litigation expenses, including money to pay for a computer expert. The attorney handling Randy Carroll Brackin’s child porn case told the Houston County Courthouse that his client would be submitting an affidavit of indigency, declaring he could not afford to retain an attorney.

The case stems from a February 5 arrest in which Houston County Sheriff’s investigators took the 62-year-old Brackin into custody, charging him with 11 felony counts of possession of child pornography or obscene material. If convicted, the man faces one to 10 years in prison for each of the class C felony crimes.

According to police reports, deputies seized evidence related to the case from five different locations, including Brackin’s office, home, a female friend’s home, a storage facility and his mother’s home. Some of the images found on computers included pictures of some sexual acts and nudity. The children depicted in the pictures were under the age of 12, authorities claimed.

Because Brackin has served as an attorney in Houston County and appeared before numerous judges in that locality, a judge from Dale County, Circuit Court Judge P.B. McLauchlin, Jr., was brought in to preside over the case. The judge has set a tentative trial date for Brackin’s case for early 2010. As a result of the criminal charges, Brackin’s license to practice law was suspended earlier this year.

The defense had asked for bond requirements to be loosened, saying that Judge Lawson Little had already withdrawn the requirement that Brackin wear an electronic ankle bracelet while out on bond. Brackin’s attorney said some of the remaining restrictions included that his client live with his mother, that he call Houston County dispatch anytime he wants to leave the house and that he cannot leave Houston County or the state of Alabama.

Dothan attorney facing child porn charges claims indigency, DothanEagle.com, September 24, 2009

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Everyday we see instances where the law doesn’t reflect the capabilities and extent of technology. This appears to be the case in Alabama and other states with frequent instances of young people, teenagers and preteens, being accused of criminal sexual behavior. As a criminal defense lawyer in the Birmingham area, I have defended numerous clients who have been accused of crimes such as drug possession, theft, sexual abuse, and pornography, just to name a few.

The newest use for smart phones (mainly by youngsters) seems to be causing a great deal of trouble. “Sexting,” or sending lewd and sexually explicit photos of oneself to friends via cell phone, has gotten a bunch of kids in trouble with local authorities. One particular case caught my eye and points to a possible flurry of court cases that may occur in the future.

According to news reports, there's an uproar in Wisconsin due to a local 14-year-old boy who is now facing child porn charges. The Milwaukee police say the boy threatened to spread rumors about the girls he targeted if they didn't send him nude and semi-nude pictures -- which they did.

Local authorities claim they found 80 images from several girls on the 14-year-old's cell phone. And one nude snapshot of a girl was found on hundreds of phones. To most parents, this will seem horrendous, but is it a crime worthy of child pornography charges?

The girls whose photos have been distributed were aged between 13 and 15 years old when they sent the photos. Investigators have not yet identified all of them.

Milwaukee police claim that the 14-year-old’s exchanging of sexually explicit photos with other kids is a simple case of child porn, and not the more common sexting that people are hearing more about. Based on news reports, investigators have also seized computers belonging to a group believed to have begun the forwarding.

While one can wonder what drove this 14-year-old to do what he did, the real question is whether or not it was innocent curiosity or truly a criminal act. The problem is that the police are attempting to apply a law that never envisioned this kind of behavior, not to mention the technology that makes it all possible.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

For those opponents of police entrapment, a recent ruling by an Alabama criminal appeals court will likely come as a disappointment, at least in regard to electronic dissemination of obscene materials and other computer sex crimes cases. As a Birmingham criminal defense lawyer representing individuals accused of criminal sexual behavior, I find some of the practices used by police and other law enforcement agencies to catch sexual predators a little difficult to swallow.

This recent decision is the first instance that an Alabama court has ruled that a crime actually has occurred when an adult uses his or her computer to convey obscene photos or other materials to what he or she believes is a child, even if that recipient is a law enforcement officer posing as a minor. While this is a blow to criminal defense attorneys who represent clients charged with sex crimes, it in no way diminishes my own personal commitment to provide an aggressive defense to people accused of crimes in our state.

According to new reports, the appeals court upheld the conviction that John Baney received in Marengo County for sending obscene pictures to what he thought were two Demopolis cheerleaders. In reality, the two profiles were created by a police officer. Although Baney and his lawyer challenged the conviction because pictures weren't received by a child, the appeals court said what mattered was Baney's intention. A new appeal is reportedly in the works by Baney's lawyer.

I have sympathy for children and minors victimized by sexual predators, but I also know that there are always two sides to every story. I also believe that every person accused of a sex crime, or any other type of crime for that matter, is entitled to a fair trial and to be represented by an attorney who will act in his or her best interests.

Computer sex still a crime, even if 'child' is adult cop, Alabama appeals court rules, AL.com, August 7, 2009

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Recently a client from Birmingham, Alabama was charged with Burglary in the first degree.  He was charged in Pelham, Alabama over in Shelby County.  He went out drinking one night and all he remembers is waking up on a couch looking at the wrong end of a police issued revolver.  His shoes and socks were placed neatly outside the front door, he had taken off his shirt and went to sleep on someone couch, in a home that was not his own.  Burglary in the first degree is defined as knowingly or unlawfully entering or remaining in a building with the intent to commit a crime.  The Alabama Burglary in the first degree statute is below:

Burglary in the first degree.

(a) A person commits the crime of burglary in the first degree if he or she knowingly and unlawfully enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling with intent to commit a crime therein, and, if, in effecting entry or while in dwelling or in immediate flight therefrom, the person or another participant in the crime:

1. Is armed with explosives; or
2. Causes physical injury to any person who is not a participant in the crime; or
3. In effecting entry, is armed with a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument or, while in the dwelling or immediate flight from the dwelling, uses or threatens the immediate use of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument against another person. The use of or threatened use of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument does not include the mere acquisition of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument during the burglary.

(b) Burglary in the first degree is a Class A felony.

My client has an excellent defense to the charges.  The state of Alabama must prove he entered the home with the intent of committing a crime.  In my clients circumstances, it will be very hard to prove he entered the home while intending to commit a crime.  His shoes were off, he had taken off his shirt to sleep, and he was in fact sleeping as the police arrested him.  It seems fairly clear, that with a quality Alabama criminal defense lawyer and attorney representing his interests, he cannot be found guilty of burglary in the first degree.  My argument would be simple.  He was extremely drunk and entered the home thinking it was his friends home.  Thus, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt this is not the case. The facts and circumstances, along with a good Alabama DUI and criminal defense attorney, will assuredly result in a not-guilty verdict. 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link